Showing 280 results

Authority record
Cape Colony

Council of Justice

  • CJ
  • Governmental body
  • 1652 – 1843

The Court of Justice at the Cape was established in 1656. Prior to this date judicial matters were dealt with by the Council of Policy but by a resolution of 28 October 1656 the latter body decided that when it sat as a court of justice and as a military court it was to consist of the commander, five members and a secretary. In 1657 the free burghers obtained representation in the court in cases in which burghers were concerned. In 1685 provision was made for the court to consist of the governor, vice- governor and eight members, the secretary having no voice in the proceedings. Initially, two of the members were burgher councillors. Until 1734 the governor acted as president of the court. In 1786 the composition of the court was altered by having six company servants and six burgher councillors under the presidency of a member of the Council of Policy. In 1792 the secretaries of the Council of Policy and Court of Justice were respectively appointed notaries public, from which date notaries were regularly admitted by the government to practice before the court until 1858 when they were admitted by authority of the Supreme Court. In 1797 Lord McCartney decreed that the court should consist of a president, the fiscal and five ordinary members. The title of president was changed to chief justice in 1812.

Until 1795 the Court of Justice was an appeal court to the inferior courts and appeal from its sentences had to be made to the Court of Justice at Batavia. This ceased at the first British Occupation until 1797 when the governor was vested with an appellate jurisdiction in cases exceeding £200 in dispute. A further appeal lay to the King-in-council where the amount was over £500. In 1803 appeals had to be carried to the National Supreme Court at The Hague and after 1806 the same procedure was re-established as in 1797. From the members of the court, commissioners (Heeren Gecommitteerden) were appointed before whom all transfers of landed property, mortgage bonds, etc were passed. This body also acted in civil cases by taking evidence, making investigations and attempting to solve cases before bringing it before the full court.

When the court was remodeled in 1786 a board called the College of Commissioners of the Court of Justice (Commissarissen uit den Raad van Justisie) was established. This board replaced the Burgher Council and generally the commissioners’ duties were of a municipal nature. On 31 January 1796 the college was abolished, its duties being assigned to a new body, the Burgher Senate.

Until 1811, Cape Town was the only seat of the criminal court but in this year a Circuit Court was establishes to try cases in the country districts.

The Archives:
The records in civil and criminal cases are fairly complete, commencing prior to the establishment of the Court of Justice and containing the minutes of the court, papers presented to the members, petitions, affidavits and papers connected with each case. The series Notarial and other documents prepared before or received by the Court of Justice includes wills, inventories, powers of attorney, contracts, declarations, attestations, certificates and inspections of persons who died suddenly, who were wounded or drowned. The documents of the Court of Appeal, 1807 – 1827 originally described with the archives of the Court of Justice, have been transferred to the archives of the Governor, the new reference numbers being indicated in the inventory. The archives of the Fiscal, such as exist, are to be found described together with the archives of the Attorney-General of the Cape (inventory 1/19).

Town Clerk, Municipality Mossel Bay

  • 3/MBA
  • Governmental body
  • 1875 – 1989

The Municipality of Mossel Bay was constituted on 5 July 1865 in terms of Proclamation No 59 of 1865 under provision of Ordinance No 9 of 1836.

In terms of the Local Government: Municipal Structures Act, 1998 (Act 117 of 1998) the existing Municipality of Mossel Bay together with the municipalities of Great Brak River and Herbertsdale, the Friemersheim Transitional Council, and the transitional representative councils of Mossel Bay and Outeniqua, was disestablished and the Mossel Bay Local Municipality established (Province of Western Cape Provincial Gazette Extraordinary No 5592, 22 September 2000, Provincial Notice No 500, 22 September 2000). The Mossel Bay Local Municipality forms part of the larger Garden Route District Municipality.

According to the Town Clerk all archives, with the exception of council and general standing committees minutes older than thirty years, were destroyed during a fire in 1961.

Town Clerk, Municipality Clanwilliam

  • 3/CWM
  • Governmental body
  • 1900 – 2000

The Municipality of Clanwilliam was constituted on 12 March 1900 under provision of Government Notice No 187, 1900 in terms of the Municipal Act of 1882 (The Cape of Good Hope Government Gazette No 8215, 16 March 1900).

In terms of the Local Government Transition Act, 1993 (Act 209 of 1993) the Municipality of Clanwilliam was dissolved with effect from 1 January 1995 and the Clanwilliam Transitional Local Council established (Province of Western Cape Provincial Gazette No 4916, 30 December 1994, Proclamation No 128, 28 December 1994).

In terms of the Local Government: Municipal Structures Act, 1998 (Act 117 of 1998) the existing Clanwilliam Transitional Local Council together with the Clanwilliam Transitional Representative Council, Citrusdal Transitional Local Council, Graafwater Municipality, Lamberts Bay Municipality, Piketberg Transitional Representative Council and the Vanrhynsdorp Transitional Representative Council was disestablished and the Cederberg Local Municipality established (Province of Western Cape Provincial Gazette Extraordinary No 5589, 22 September 2000, Provincial Notice No 482, 22 September 2000). The Cederberg Local Municipality forms part of the larger West Coast District Municipality.

According to a declaration signed by the Town Clerk, Clanwilliam in 1987, Council archives prior to 1955 that are missing from the various series in this inventory could not be traced.

Secretary, Table Bay Harbour Board

  • CHB
  • Governmental body
  • 1848 – 1911

In December 1836, Lord Glenelg authorized the creation of a harbor board for Table Bay with power to collect wharfage charges, to borrow money on security of such charges and to complete the stone pier, on which work had been suspended in1833. The unofficial members of the Legislative Council objected to this scheme, advocating that the government should construct two or three cheap jetties which would serve the purpose of trade until a more comprehensive scheme could be undertaken. This course was adopted and two jetties were built at the foot of Bree Street, one costing £1404, the other costing £7479.

After the opening of the second jetty for use on 1 June 1842, nothing further was done as regards harbor works until 27 June 1844, when the Legislative Council passed a resolution requesting the Governor to appoint a board to report upon “the practicability, advantage and probable expense of constructing a breakwater in Table Bay”.

As a direct result of the decision taken by the Legislative Council, a commission consisting of four persons was appointed on 15 August 1844, being entrusted to investigate, inter alia, the practicability of making Table Bay a safe harbor.

The recommendations of the commission were forwarded to the Secretary of State by the Governor who proposed that a board of commissioners for the improvement of the harbours of the Colony, with powers similar to those of Road Boards, should be appointed.

The Governor’s proposals were favourably considered by the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty and at the same time the Imperial Government declared itself willing to grant the Colony a loan for the construction of a breakwater. The Colonial Government availed itself of this offer by passing Ordinance No 21 on 29 October 1847, which provided for the appointment of harbour boards to consist of not less than three and not more than five members.

In terms of this ordinance, the harbour boards were required to submit reports to the Governor in regard to works considered necessary for the improvement of the harbour for which they were appointed and all works completed, and lands reclaimed from the sea were vested in them. The right to make use of public or certain private lands required for harbour improvements was conferred on the boards. The Governor was empowered with the consent of the legislative to authorise the periodic raising of the required funds by means of loans. The boards were authorised to employ engineers, surveyors and other officials and were permitted to establish tolls and rates for the use of piers, harbours, quays, etc.

Ordinance No 1 of 1848 made provision for the construction of a “sea wall” in Table Bay and on 26 July of that year William Field, JB Ebden, W Billingsley, James Searight and John Stein were appointed “commissioners for improving the port and harbour of Table Bay”, with William Field being appointed chairman. The first meeting of the board was held on 29 July 1848 at the Custom’s House.

During the first years of the Board’s administration various minor works were undertaken, such as the erection of new jetties and wharfs.

From 1854 the Colonial Government began to give serious consideration to the question of the improvement of Table Bay. Various schemes were proposed but it was not until 1860 that a design for a breakwater, an inner dock and outer basin, estimated to cost £399,000 and submitted by John Coode, an eminent harbour engineer, was approved by Parliament.

Subsequent to the approval by Parliament of Coode’s scheme, Act No 6 of 1860 was passed, which made provision for the borrowing of £200,000 for the construction of a breakwater and for the appointment of a board of commissioners to consist of seven persons, charged with the supervision of the work and with the administration of the properties, funds and revenues connected with the harbour. The new board was appointed on 13 August 1860.

The construction of the breakwater was commenced on 17 September 1860 and the following year the Board was authorised to commence building the docks.

On completion of one of the docks in 1868, it consequently became necessary to regulate the trade of the harbour and the use of the docks. This objective was realised by the passing of Act No 18 of 1868 which entrusted the management of the docks to the Harbour Board appointed in August 1860. In terms of this act, the Board could appoint officers and frame regulations.

In view of the fact that the levying of wharfage dues on goods landed and shipped gave rise to certain complications, the board recommended that a tonnage duty be substituted. This recommendation was given effect by the passing of Act No 22 of 1872 which also altered the constitution of the Board by reducing the number of members from seven to five.

In terms of Act No 26 of 1881 the management of the docks and the breakwater as well as any further works of construction or maintenance were entrusted to a board of seven commissioners styled the “Table Bay Harbour Board”, four of whom were to be appointed by the Governor. Of these four nominee members no more than two could be persons holding offices of profit under the Crown. The elective members were returned by a constituency of importers and exporters of merchandise in Cape Town, who had voting powers according to the amount of dock dues paid, in the proportion of one vote for every £100 of dues.

The nominee members were to hold office during pleasure whereas the elective members had to vacate their seats in rotation, each member sitting for two years and being eligible for re-election. Each member was to receive £1 for each meeting attended which was not to exceed £100 in any one year.

In terms of Act No 11 of 1890 the mayor of Cape Town was an ex officio member of the board during his period of office.

Under the general sanction of the government through the Commissioner of Crown Lands and Public Works, the commissioners of the Board had direct control over the administration of their funds.

Under the provisions of Act No 36 of 1896, a board of seven commissioners was established for each of the harbours of Table Bay, Port Elizabeth and East London. Three of the members were appointed by the Governor and two were elected by a constituency specially constituted under the act. Of the remaining two members in respect of the Table Bay Harbour Board, the mayor or the deputy mayor of Cape Town was a member. The other member was elected by the Cape Town Chamber of Commerce. The same procedure applied to the other two harbour boards.

In terms of the “Harbour Control Act” of 1908 the harbour boards at Cape Town, Port Elizabeth and East London were abolished as from 1 January 1909, the administration of the harbours being placed under the Cape Government Railways. At the same time provision was made for the establishment of advisory boards for the harbours.

The Port Captain and other Officials:
After the passing of Act No 18 of 1868 the port captain was also appointed dock master. This arrangement did not meet the approval of the Board who warned the Governor of the inconvenience that might eventually arise from the amalgamation of posts. As the trade of the port increased the need for placing the docks on a more satisfactory footing led to further representation being made by the Board to government. Eventually the virtual abolition of the dual office of port captain and dock superintendent was obtained and in March 1876 an officer with the latter designation was appointed, being charged with the entire superintendence of the working of the docks and the control of shipping.

From 1 April 1886, the department of the port captain and the dock superintendent were once again amalgamated, the incumbent of the office being appointed both dock superintendent and port captain.

Owing to the extent of the harbour works under construction and the increased trade of the docks the Board decided in 1882 to relieve the resident engineer of all supervision over the Maintenance Department and from 1883 there were two departments, a Department of Construction and a Department of Maintenance, each under an engineer. This arrangement continued until August 1884 when the two aforementioned departments were amalgamated.

The designation “resident engineer” was altered in 1897(28) to “engineer-in-chief” and in 1900 to “engineer-to-the-board”.

Act No 36 of 1896 conferred on the Table Bay Harbour Board the right to appoint, subject to the approval of the Governor, the port captain for Table Bay. This official, although under the control of the Board, was responsible to the Governor on all matters relating to quarantine laws and regulations.

On 23 November 1901 the Table Bay Harbour Board decided to appoint a general manager who would have control of the working and administration of all departments. Mr RH Hammersley Heenan was appointed to the office and Mr Frank Robb was appointed assistant general manager and secretary.(30) In September 1902 Mr Hammersley Heenan was appointed general manager and engineer-in-chief. Owing to the discontinuance of all construction work and the depressed financial situation, the office of the general manager was abolished on 28 February 1907.

Surveyor-General

  • SG
  • Governmental body
  • 1828 – 1942

Origin of the Office:
Prior to the establishment of the Surveyor-General’s office, the Inspector of Lands and Woods performed the duties of that office. In November 1828 the first Surveyor-General, Major CC Michell was appointed, holding in addition the posts of Civil Engineer and Superintendent of Works. The Board of Commissioners for Lands (Land Board) was established in the same month and the Surveyor-General was appointed a member of this board. Already in 1826 the Commissioners of Inquiry had set out in detail the duties of the Surveyor-General. No further information as to his duties could be traced until the newly-appointed Surveyor-General received instructions from the Colonial Secretary concerning the running of the Department of the Surveyor-General and Civil Engineer.

Department of the Surveyor-General and Civil Engineer:
The office of Surveyor-General and the office of Civil Engineer were distinct but both offices fell under the superintendence of the Surveyor-General. The Assistant Surveyor-General was the immediate head of the Surveyor-General’s office and the Civil Engineer was the immediate head of the Civil Engineer’s office. Each office was under the direction of its own immediate head, and, in the absence of the Surveyor-General, the Assistant Surveyor-General had no power of superintendence over the Civil Engineer’s office.

Although the Surveyor-General was empowered to superintend the Civil Engineer’s office, the Civil Engineer was to receive instructions in routine matters direct from the Government in order to avoid a multiplicity of business in the hands of the Surveyor-General. The Surveyor-General had the right to inspect the work of the Civil Engineer’s office which task he was expected to perform periodically.

The Civil Engineer’s office was removed from the jurisdiction of the Surveyor-General in 1848, being organised under the direction of the Colonial Civil Engineer.

Development:
The Surveyor-General’s office fell under the jurisdiction of the Colonial Secretary from 1829 to 1872, when the Commissioner of Crown Lands and Public Works became the minister of state responsible for the control of the office until 1892. From that year the Surveyor-General’s office fell under the Department of Lands, Mines and Agriculture. The re-organisation of the department in terms of Act No 14 of 1893 resulted in the Surveyor-General being placed under the authority of the Secretary of Agriculture.

On 31 May 1910 control over the surveying of land passed into the hands of the Union Government and the Surveyor-General came under the authority of the Department of Lands.

Organisation of the Office in 1829:
Originally the Surveyor-General’s office consisted of the following officials:
(1) The Surveyor-General,
(2) The Assistant Surveyor-General,
(3) The Chief Clerk, whose duty it was to keep all records, books and papers of the office, except those more properly belonging to the drawing department. He was also to perform the duty of Secretary of the Land Board,
(4) The Draftsman, whose duties included the execution of all diagrams annexed to deeds of grant and he was to keep all plans and diagrams, etc., and
(5) One other clerk.

As the work of the office expanded the number of members of staff increased.

Functions:
The functions of the proposed post of Surveyor-General were set out in the report of the Commissioners of Inquiry in 1826. No further details could be traced in connection with the proposed functions of the post until January 1829 when it was stated that the Surveyor-General was to receive all reports from Civil Commissioners concerning lands to be granted. The Surveyor-General had to lay such reports before the Land Board, which, in turn, submitted reports to the Government. All titles, leases and other papers relating to land had to be prepared by the Surveyor-General.

Sub- and Related Offices:

The Deputy Surveyor-General, Eastern Province including Various Land Commissioners:
In 1855 the office of the Deputy Surveyor-General, Eastern Province, was established as a sub- or branch office of the Surveyor-General’s office to deal with land matters in the Eastern Province. The office was abolished in 1867. The Surveyor-General did not continue to use the files and registers. The archives which were kept intact in his office, before being transferred to this repository, constitutes the separate archives group of the Deputy Surveyor-General, Eastern Province (reference DSGEP).

The archives of a number of land commissioners are also included in the archives of the Deputy Surveyor-General.

Surveyor-General, Griqualand West and the British Bechuanaland Land Commission

These two archives which have been kept separate, relate to the administration of land matters in Griqualand West and British Bechuanaland before those territories were annexed by the Cape Colony in 1880 and 1895 respectively.

The Archives:
The archives of the Surveyor-General housed in this repository comprises mainly the various series letters received and letters despatched, their relevant registers and indexes, correspondence files and financial papers.

List of Surveyor-Generals
Name and Date of Appointment:
Michell, Colonel CC (1829)
Bell, CD (1848)
De Smidt, A (1872)
Marquard, L (1889)
Horne, JT (1892)
Jurisch, CLHM (1902)
Van Renen, H (acting, 1904)
Cornish-Bowden, AH (acting, 1905)
Cornish-Bowden, AH (1906)

Town Clerk, Municipality Knysna

  • 3/KNY
  • Governmental body
  • 1881 - 2001

The Municipality of Knysna was constituted on 12 October 1881 under provision of proclamation No 169 in terms of Ordinance No 9 of 1836.

In terms of the Local Government: Municipal Structures Act, 1998 (Act 117 of 1998) the existing Municipality of Knysna, Sedgefield Transitional Local Council, Belvidere Estate Transitional Local Council, Brenton Transitional Local Council, Knoetzie Transitional Local Council, Outeniqua Transitional Representative Council and Rheenendal Transitional Local Council was disestablished and the Knysna Local Municipality established (Province of Western Cape Provincial Gazette Extraordinary No 5592, 22 September 2000, Provincial Notice No 504, 22 September 2000). The Knysna Local Municipality forms part of the larger Garden Route (formerly Eden) District Municipality.

Town Clerk, Municipality Beaufort West

  • 3/BFW
  • Governmental body
  • 1837 - 1992

The Municipality of Beaufort West was constituted on 3 February 1837 under the provisions of Ordinance 9 of 1836.

In terms of the Local Government: Municipal Structures Act, 1998 (Act 117 of 1998) the existing Beaufort West Municipality together with the Beaufort West Transitional Representative Council was disestablished and the Beaufort West Local Municipality established (Province of Western Cape Provincial Gazette Extraordinary No 5593, 22 September 2000, Provincial Notice No 508, 22 September 2000). The Beaufort West Local Municipality forms part of the larger Central Karoo District Municipality.

Master of the Supreme Court, Cape Town

  • MOOC
  • Governmental body
  • 1670 - 1996

As was the case in Batavia, the establishment of the Orphan Chamber at the Cape of Good Hope arose out of the need to provide for the collection and administration of the property of persons who died intestate and left heirs who were absent from the Colony or who were under age. The property of persons who died on the voyage to and from Europe and found on board, was also subject to the jurisdiction of the Orphan Chamber. However, the Government was advised in a letter dated 30th March, 1711 that the Chamber was not to be burdened with deceased estates of Company’s servants and burgers who had died on the voyage.

The main functions and duties of the Orphan Chamber were:

The administration of the estates of persons dying intestate in the Colony or on the voyage and leaving absent or minor heirs, as well as estates of those who had not specifically
excluded the Orphan Master in their will, or had specifically appointed them even where their heirs were majors and resident here;
The registration of wills of deceased persons;
The administration of minors’ property;
Receiving and paying to present and absent claimants the portions or legacies due to them;
Keeping a death register of persons who died at the Cape;
Recording the resolutions and transactions of the Board.

After the devastating effect of the smallpox epidemic of 1713, the Council of Policy empowered the Orphan Chamber to protect the transfer of property of all free individuals at the Cape. All wills and deaths at the Cape had to be registered with the Orphan Chamber but the Chamber only inventoried and acted as executor for the categories of estates listed below.

The Orphan Chamber was the executor of the estates of free persons:
who left heirs under 25 (and unmarried) or of unsound mind;
who left heirs who were either out of the country or not apparent;
who died ab intestato or ex testamento (without a will or testament);
if there was a specific request in the will or testament for the Chamber to act as executor;
if the will did not specifically exclude the Chamber from acting as executor.

The Orphan Chamber had to track down any possible heirs. Heirs residing outside of the country of death had to send a power of attorney proving their relationship to the deceased, and the Orphan Chamber would then pay out what was rightfully theirs. If an individual died without children or spouse, then the inheritance went to their next of kin, whether brothers, sisters, parents, or cousins (sometimes even to the 10th degree). If an inhabitant, or a stranger, died at the Cape without any acknowledged relatives, the property, after discharging the debts, was sold, and reserved for the unknown heirs, and every method was taken for their discovery. If no heir was found within 50 years from the date of death, the estate reverted to the Government.

In 1714 the Government issued to the Orphan Masters a set of rules and Regulations by which they were to be guided in the carrying out of their duties (Resolutions, Council of Policy, 26 June 1714). These instructions were taken from the Statutes of Batavia, together with a tariff of fees which were to be charged in administering an estate.

In 1793 renewed instructions were issued and compiled from the 1714 rules, from those of the Orphan Chamber at Batavia, from a sketch of instructions submitted to the Government by the Orphan Masters, and from a report relative to the improvement to the Chamber.

Provisional instructions were framed for the Orphan Chamber by Commissioner General Jacob de Mist but these show that they were evidently framed more with a view to confirm the existing rules than to introduce new regulations.

The following are two of the articles of the instructions laid down: Immovable property of orphans could only be sold by an order of Court, and such property had to be put up for public auction and sold to the highest bidder. A minor, absent from the country for sixteen years, could be publicly summonsed at his last-known place of residence. If it was ascertained what had happened to him, his heirs could receive his property upon giving security de restituendo. Persons had to obey a summons to appear before the Masters as if it had emanated from a Court, and upon a third default to appear they could be brought before the Court of Justice. From the resolutions sent from time to time by the Government to the Board and the instructions framed in 1793, it would appear that the Orphan Masters were given almost the same portion of authority and jurisdiction in testamentary matters as was exercised in earlier periods by the spiritual Courts in England.

According to the provisions of Ordinances 104 and 105 of 1833, the Orphan Chamber was abolished and its duties were transferred to the newly appointed office of Master of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court of the Cape of Good Hope was established in 1827. Subsequently a code for the administration and distribution of insolvent estates was enacted on behalf of minors and persons under curatorship.

The Master controls the administration of deceased and insolvent estates. In this connection he protects the property rights of creditors and heirs and especially of minors. The acts which mainly control his functions are the Administration of Estates Act, 1965 (Act 66 of 1965), the Insolvency Act, 1936 (Act 24 of 1936), the Companies Act, 1973 (Act 61 of 1973), the Close Corporations Act, 1984 (Act 69 of 1984) and the Trust Property Control Act, 1988 (Act 57 of 1988). He appoints executors and trustees in estates and liquidators of companies. He has in respect of minors to a limited extent the function of upper guardian, especially in regard to alienation of hypothecation of their immovable property. The interests of mentally affected persons and persons under curatorship are also protected by him. The most important task of the Master~s office is to check liquidation and distribution accounts. He has wide powers to enforce proper administration by executors, liquidators and trustees. There were six Master~s offices in South Africa prior to 1997, one in each of the provincial capitals and one at Kimberley and also Grahamstown.

Secretary, Divisional Council of Kuruman

  • 4/KMN
  • Governmental body
  • 1907 – 1989

The first members of the Divisional Council of Kuruman were announced in a Government Notice dated 19 June 1907. In terms of this notice the members met for the first time on 30 July 1907 (Cape of Good Hope Government Gazette No 8973 dated 25 June 1907).

As from 1 January 1990 the division of Kuruman was entrusted with regional services council functions under the Regional Services Councils Act No 109 of 1985 (The Province of the Cape of Good Hope Official Gazette No 4621 dated 22 December 1989, Proclamation No 978 dated 22 December 1989).

Magistrate, Namaqualand (Springbok)

  • 1/SBK
  • Governmental body
  • 1852 – 1966

In 1855 it was decided to establish a magistracy at the missionary station Kamaggas, formerly part of the district of Clanwilliam. The new district, of which the boundaries were defined, was called Namaqualand. The seat of magistracy was, however, established on the farm of Philips and King, Springbokfontein. Although still part of the division of Clanwilliam, the resident magistrate acted as civil commissioner within the limits of Namaqualand up to 1856 when Namaqualand was constituted an independent division for fiscal purposes. The magisterial district’s boundaries, which were also to be the boundaries of the division, were also altered.

In 1917 a periodical court in the district of Namaqualand was established at Bowesdorp and moved to Kamieskroon in 1929.

Another periodical court in the district was established at Wallekraal in 1931 with jurisdiction within specified limits.

Magistrates of Namaqualand, 1855 – 1960
JC Rivers (1855 – 1858)
WH Auret (1858 – 1859)
L Anthing (1859 – 1862)
EA Judge (1862 – 1868)
L Boyes (1869 – 1878)
PJ de Smidt (1878 – 1879)
JT Eustace (1879 – 1890)
WC Scully (1891 – 1892)
HM Blakeway (1893 – 1897)
JD Hugo (1897 – 1898)
JB van Renen (1898 – 1902)
J Herbst (1902 – 1903)
WM Eustace (1903 – 1905)
W Magennis (1905 – 1909)
MM Basson (1909)
DC Giddy (1910 – 1915)
AW Preston (1915 – 1917)
G v R Philpott (1917 – 1920)
PA Garcia (1920 – 1923)
JA Verschuur (1923 – 1924)
JG Freislich (1925 – 1928)
MJ Streak (1929 – 1930)
WS Anderson (1931 – 1932)
SH Elliot (1933 – 1934)
CD Stanier (1935 – 1937)
WVD Cellaruis (1938 – 1939)
JT Fritz (1940)
NB Arbuthnot (1941 – 1943)
CJ Jooste (1944 – 1950)
RN Fuller (1951 – 1953)
JC Cooper (1954 - 1960)

Results 1 to 10 of 280